“Eccentric,” says Diana Vreeland, as played by Juliet Stevenson, “is a word that boring people use to describe someone I think of as interesting.” Boring people might call Infamous, a film about Truman Capote, “eccentric.”
Some might think of Infamous as “the second Capote movie,” since it premiered about a year after the 2005 film Capote, which won Philip Seymour Hoffman the Oscar for best actor. While I highly admire Hoffman’s work (particularly in such flicks as Nobody’s Fool, Magnolia, and even his very comic turn in Along Came Polly), if Infamous had come out before Copote, I doubt he’d have snagged the golden statue, and I’d be willing to wager that Toby Jones — who plays, or rather, becomes “Tru Heart” in Infamous — would have at least garnered a nomination. (This film also stars Sandra Bullock, Daniel Craig, Sigourney Weaver, Hope Davis, Jeff Daniels, Gwyneth Paltrow, and Isabella Rossellini.)
For my money, Infamous gives a more textured and nuanced portrayal of Truman Capote, a writer who had split lives between high society and his oldest friends, between his flamboyant wit and his dark past. This film is based on George Plimpton’s book Truman Capote: In Which Various Friends, Enemies, Acquaintances and Detractors Recall His Turbulent Career, an oral history of Capote. Thanks to this built-in format, writer/director Douglas McGrath gives himself the ability to add exposition (in the form of “interviews” with Capote’s pals) to paint a clearer picture of Truman, explaining his motives, both as a sassy gossip and as a writer obsessed with a morbid tale, a tale that takes over his life.
That thing called “plot” goes like this…. Truman Capote reads a 300-word article in The New York Times about a quadruple murder in Holcomb, Kansas, and he decides to write an article about the impact of the crime on this small town. Once there, with his friend Harper Lee along for the ride, he finds it difficult to get folks to open up, until they realize that he’s interesting, funny, and connected to the stars (he can’t seem to help himself but name-drop). As the story of the murders becomes clearer, Capote decides to write an entire nonfiction book on the subject. He ends up interviewing the two criminals at great length, developing a close emotional bond with Perry Smith, one of the two murderers. The pair are found guilty, and, after a numerous appeals, are hung, allowing Capote to add the final period to In Cold Blood.
That’s the bear bones version. But when you watch the whole movie, you’ll see a writer unraveling, obsessing, and changing, or, what is more likely the case, coming to grips with his own desires and his own hidden past.
Here’s the thing: this film and the film Capote differ a great in terms of the “facts,” which raises the important conflicts behind any form of nonfiction story-telling. There’s no way not to lie, to bend reality, to the alter the facts, because the facts are always relative. The truth, it turns out, might only exist in our imaginations. And as we see in Infamous, this “fact” is both delightfully freeing and overwhelmingly terrifying at the same time.
For a witty and wise film about duality, art, crime, and hope, check out the trailer below. You won’t be bored, or, for that matter, boring.
Just a head’s up on the newest member of our sidebar, a blog-ad for
America has done almost all it can to systematically and cavalerly destroy Native American traditions, reservations, and the rights of soveriegn Native nations. I’m not sure, if we look back through our shared history, if we could have done much more harm. Now we have a chance to, in a small way, undo some of what we’ve done, what we’re all responsible for changing.
National Breast Cancer Awareness Month
As we see it, part of our job at Progressive Wednesday is to point you, dear readers, toward art, be it visual, linguistic, or musical, that has impacted our lives in the hope that it might impact yours.
But Chihuly isn’t solely responsible for his work. Glass-blowing on his scale necessarily requires a team of skilled artisans, and his even more so: Chihuly is blind in one eye and lacks depth perception. His singular vision (no pun, I swear it, intended) seems to be to create pure beauty. With these groups of artists, he’s able to make, not just small objects someone might keep their home, but glass sculptures that can exist in public spaces.
On February 20th (we thought we’d give you a couple of days notice), everyone’s favorite chain restaurant (well, okay, my favorite chain restaurant),
Project Linus